Outcomes of the Ross Procedure in the Pediatric Population

Anton A. Lukyanov*; Yuriy N.Gorbatyh, PhD,ScD; Alexander V. Bogachev-Prokofyev, PhD; Yuriy L. Naberuchin, PhD,ScD; Alexander Yu. Omelchenko, PhD; Timur S. Khapaev, PhD; Alexander M. Karaskov, PhD,ScD

Academician E.N.Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology, Novosibirsk, the Russian Federation

*Corresponding author: Anton A. Lukyanov, Center for Pediatric Cardiac Surgery and Neonatal Surgery of the Academician E.N.Meshalkin Novosibirsk Research Institute of Circulation Pathology .Novosibirsk, Russia. E-mail: anthony1206@rambler.ru

Published: March 25, 2015. DOI: 10.21103/Article5(1)_CR3


The Ross procedure (RP) is considered by many authors as the best option for aortic valve replacement in young children and adolescents. This paper presents the results of the immediate and late postoperative period (more than 5 years) after the RP among pediatric patients.

Keywords: Ross procedure; pediatric population; immediate results; long term outcome.
  1. Lukyanov AA, Gorbatykh YN, Omelchenko AY, Naberuchin YL, Ivanov AA, Gorbatykh AV, et al. The Ross procedure in congenital aortic valve disease surgery, graft selection. J Pathol Blood Circul Heart Surg 2013; 4:63-4. [Article in Russian].
  2.  Bechtchel JF, Bartels C, Schmidtke C, Skibba W, Muller-Steinhardt M, Kluter H, et al. Does histocompatibility affect homograft valve function after the Ross procedure? Circulation 2001; 104(12 Supp 1):125-8.
  3. Hörer J, Bening C, Vogt M, Martin K, Cleuziou J, Tassani-Prell P, et al. Predonation of autologous blood reduces perioperative allogenic transfusion requirement in grown-up patients with congenital heart disease. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2010; 37(5):991-5.
  4. Brown JW, Rodefeld MD, Ruzmetov M, Eltayeb O, Yurdakok O, Tourentine MW. Surgical valvuloplasty versus balloon aortic dilation for congenital aortic stenosis: are evidence-based outcomes relevant?  Ann Thorac Surg 2012; 94(1):146-53.
  5. Lambert V, Obreja D, Losay J, Touchot-Kone A, Piot JD, Serraf A, et al. Long-term results after valvotomy for congenital aortic valvar stenosis in children. Cardiol Young 2000; 10(6):590-6.  
  6. Hazekamp MG, Grotenhuis HB, Schoof  PH, Rijlaarsdam ME, Ottenkamp J, Dion RA. Results of the Ross operation in a pediatric population. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005; 27(6):975–9.
  7. Charitos EI, Takkenberg JJ, Hanke T, Gorski A, Botha C, Franke U, et al. Reoperations on the pulmonary autograft and pulmonary homograft after the Ross procedure: An update on the German Dutch Ross Registry. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2012; 144(4):813-21.
  8. Karamlou T, Jang K, Williams WG, Caldarone CA, VanArsdell G, Coles JG, et al. Outcomes and associated risk factors for aortic valve replacement in 160 children: a competing-risks analysis. Circulation 2005; 112(22):3462-9.
  9. Dzemeshkevich S L, Stephenson LU, Alexi-Meskhishvili VV. Diseases of the aortic valve. Moscow; 2004.
  10. Karaskov AM, Gorbatykh YN, Zheleznev SI, Turaev FF. Influence of initial indicator of patients on results prognostication for Ross procedure. J Pathol Blood Circul Heart Surg 2009; 3:86-90. [Article in Russian].
  11.  Elder RW, Quaeqebeur JM, Bacha EA, Chen JM, BourlonF, Williams IA. Outcomes of the infant Ross procedure for congenital aortic stenosis followed into adolescence. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145(6):1504-11.

The fully formatted PDF version is available.       

Download Article

Int J Biomed. 2015; 5(1):16-19. © 2015 International Medical Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved.