Epidemiology of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis and Related Risk Factors in Female Residents of Tashkent and Namangan (Republic of Uzbekistan)

S. I. Ismailov, L.S. Abboskhodjaeva, N.M. Alikhanova

Center for the Scientific and Clinical Study of Endocrinology, Uzbekistan Public Health Ministry; Tashkent, Uzbekistan

*Corresponding author: Prof.  Said I. Ismailov, PhD, Scd. Director of the Center for the Scientific and Clinical Study of Endocrinology, Tashkent, Uzbekistan E-mail: ismailov.said@list.ru

Published: June 25, 2015. DOI: 10.21103/Article5(2)_Ep1

Abstract: 

Our epidemiological survey is the first step in studying prevalence and risk factors of postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO) in the Republic of Uzbekistan, aiming at development of early preventive and therapeutic measures to reduce osteoporosis-associated fractures.

Methods: We screened 1378 postmenopausal female residents of Tashkent and Namangan, two cities with the largest populations in Uzbekistan, aged from 50 to 80. The duration of the postmenopausal period was ≥1 year.

Results: According to our data, the prevalence of osteoporosis in different regions of Uzbekistan varies widely (33.5% and 51.1% in Tashkent and Namangan, respectively). The prevalence of osteoporosis increases with age from 25.6% (50 to 59 years) to 51.3% (in >70 age group) in Tashkent and from 44.0% to 80.0% in the same age groups in Namangan.

There were significantly more women in Namangan with body mass <57kg than in Tashkent (OR 2.44; 95%CI 1.72-3.46; P<0.00001). We found that the number of women doing physical exercises in Tashkent was 2 times more than in Namangan (65.5% versus 36.1%, OR 3.36; 95%CI 2.64-4.27; P<0.0001).

Conclusion: Our research shows that osteoporosis is widely spread among women above 50 living in two big densely populated cities of Uzbekistan (Tashkent and Namangan). Low body mass and irregular physical activity, fracture history, and duration of menopause are the factors of risk in the studied cohorts of women. 

Keywords: 
menopause; risk factors; osteopenia; osteoporosis.
References: 
  1.  Baccaro LF, Conde DM, Costa-Paiva L, Pinto-Neto AM. The epidemiology and management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: a viewpoint from Brazil. Clin Interv Aging 2015; 10:583–91.
  2. Kim MY, Im SW, Park HM.The demographic changes of menopausal and geripausal Women in Korea. J Bone Metab 2015; 22(1):23-8.
  3. Matin N, Tabatabaie O, Keshtkar A, Yazdani K, Asadi M. Development and validation of osteoporosis prescreening model for Iranian postmenopausal women. J Diabetes Metab Disord 2015; 14:12.
  4. Hodgson SF, Watts NB, Bilezikian JP, Clarke BL, Gray TK, Harris DW, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: 2001 edition, with selected updates for 2003. Endocr Pract 2003; 9(6):544-64.
  5. Toroptsova NV, Nikitinskaya OA, Demin NV, Benevolenskaya LI. Prevention of post-menopausal osteoporosis: results of three-year observation. Sci Prac Rheum 2006; 5:25-32. [Article in Russian].
  6. Barrett-Connor E1, Siris ES, Wehren LE, Miller PD, Abbott TA, Berger ML, et al. Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups. J Bone Miner Res 2005; 20(2):185–94
  7. Cauley JA1, Palermo L, Vogt M, Ensrud KE, Ewing S, Hochberg M, et al. Prevalent vertebral fractures in black women and white women. J Bone Miner Res 2008; 23(9):1458–67.
  8. Lansdown D1, Bennet B, Thiel S, Ahmed O, Dixon L, Vokes TJ. Prevalence of vertebral fractures on chest radiographs of elderly African American and Caucasian women. Osteoporos Int 2011;22(8):2365–2371
  9. Kandiloytu AYu. Osteopenic syndrome in per-menopausal female residents of Tashkent, its correction. Abstract of PhD Thesis. Tashkent; 2005. [in Russian].
  10. Aggarwal N1, Raveendran A, Khandelwal N, Sen RK, Thakur JS, Dhaliwal LK, et al. Prevalence and related risk factors of osteoporosis in peri- and postmenopausal Indian women. J Midlife Health 2011; 2(2):81-5.
  11. Rahmani P, Morin S. Prevention of osteoporosis-related fractures among postmenopausal women and older men. CMAJ 2009; 181(11): 815-20.
  12. Wright NC1, Looker AC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Delzell ES, Randall S, et al. The recent prevalence of osteoporosis and low bone mass in the United States based on bone mineral density at the femoral neck or lumbar spine. J Bone Miner Res 2014; 29(11):2520–6.
  13. Brown JP, Josse RG; Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada. 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 2002;167 (10 Suppl):S1–34
  14. De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al. Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporosis Int. 2005;16(11): 1330–1338.
  15. Bonaiuti D, Arioli G, Diana G, Franchignoni F, Giustini A, Monticone M, et al. Rehabilitation treatment Guidelines in postmenopausal and senile Osteoporosis. Eura Medicophys 2005; 41(4):315–37.
  16. van Geel TA1, Geusens PP, Nagtzaam IF, van der Voort DJ, Schreurs CM, Rinkens PE, et al. Risk factors for clinical fractures among postmenopausal women: a 10-year prospective study. Menopause Int 2007; 13(3):110-5.
  17. van Geel TA, Nguyen ND, Geusens PP, Center JR, Nguyen TV, Dinant GJ, et al. Development of a simple prognostic nomogram for individualising 5-year and 10-yearabsolute risks of fracture: a population-based prospective study among postmenopausal women. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70(1):92-7.
  18. Rojinskaya LYa. Systemic osteoporosis. Moscow, “Mokeev” Publishing House; 2000. [in Russian].

The fully formatted PDF version is available.           

Download Article

Int J Biomed. 2015; 5(2):95-99. © 2015 International Medical Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved.