High-Pressure Oxygen Insufflation of the Sorbent in Complex Treatment of Clean Soft Tissue Wounds

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Dmitry V. Arhipov, Alexandr A. Andreev, Аlexandr А. Glukhov, Dmitry A. Atiakshin, Anton P. Ostroushko, Sergey N. Boyev, Anastasiya Yu. Laptiyova

 
International Journal of Biomedicine. 2020;10(3):247-250.
DOI: 10.21103/Article10(3)_OA9
Originally published September 10, 2020

Abstract: 

Background: The aim of our research was to study the effectiveness of the potentiation of reparative processes in soft tissues using high-pressure oxygen insufflations of the sorbent (S-HPOI) in the experiment.
Methods and Results: The study included 150 Wistar rats that were divided into 5 groups: four control groups and one experimental group. Each group included 30 animals. The identical soft tissue wounds were simulated in animals of all groups. No additional interventions were carried out in the animals of the control group (CG) 1; high-pressure oxygen and air insufflation of wounds were applied in animals of CG2 and CG3, respectively; sorbent applications were performed for wound treatment in animals of CG4. The technique of S-HPOI was applied in animals of the experimental group (EG). The results of the experiment were assessed immediately after the simulation procedure, and on Days 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14 after wound simulation. The use of the sorbent applications and S-HPOI contributed to a significant acceleration of reparative processes by 1.1-1.3 and 1.2-1.5 times, respectively, compared with the results obtained in animals of CG1.
Conclusion: The use of high-pressure oxygen has practically no benefits in wound treatment compared to similar intervention using air jet.On the whole, S-HPOI resulted in the maximum reduction in the area of soft tissue wounds: by 74.0% in 3 days, by 99.5% in 10 days compared to the initial findings.

Keywords: 
soft tissue wounds • high-pressure oxygen insufflations • sorbent
References: 
  1. Kuzin MI, Kostyuchenok BM. Wounds and wound infection. Moscow: Meditsina; 1990/ [In Russian].
  2. Akers KS, Mende K, Cheatle KA, Zera WC, Yu X, Beckius ML, et al.; Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program Trauma Infectious Disease Outcomes Study Group. Biofilms and persistent wound infections in United States military trauma patients: a case-control analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:190. Published 2014 Apr 8. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-190
  3. Murphy-Lavoie HM, Bhimji SS. Diabetic, Foot infections. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2017.
  4. Izmailov AG, Dobrokvashin SV, Volkov DE, Pyrkov VA, Zakirov RF, Davlet-Kildeev SA. [New approaches in local drug treatment of infected wounds in soft tissue]. Practical medicine. 2015; 91(6):67-72. [Article in Russian].
  5. Gluhov AA, Andreev AA, Shmarin AA, Lobas SV. [Barbotage sanitation in surgical treatment of diabetic foot syndrome]. Infektsii v Hirurgii. 2018; 16(1-2): 83-84. [Article in Russian].
  6. Smotrin SM, Oslavskii AI, Melamed VD, Grakovich PN. Sorption-drainage devices in complex treatment of purulent wounds and soft tissue abscesses. Novosti Khirurgii. 2016;24(5):457-464. [Article in Russian].
  7. Shulutko AM, Osmanov EG, Gogokhiya TR, Khmyrova SE. [Application of plasma flows in patients with surgical soft tissue infection]. Vestn Khir Im I I Grek. 2017;176(1):65-69. [Article in Russian].
  8. Vinnik YS, Plakhotnikova AM, Kirichenko AK. [The use of a directed flow of ozone-oxygen gas mixture to sanitize a purulent wound in the experiment]. Novosti Khirurgii. 2015;23(4): 372-378. [Article in Russian].
  9.  Girev EA, Zarivchatskii MF, Orlov OA, Shavkunov SP. [Investigation of the concentration of oxygen in soft tissues of an operative wound edge in stomach cancer surgery]. Family Health — the 21 Century. 2015;1(1):57-67. [Article in Russian].

Download Article
Received July 4, 2020.
Accepted August 12, 2020.
©2020 International Medical Research and Development Corporation.