The Impact of PET/MRI Fusion on the Diagnostic Imaging Industry

REVIEW
Shrooq Aldahery

 
International Journal of Biomedicine. 2023;13(3):46-53.
DOI: 10.21103/Article13(3)_RA4
Originally published September 5, 2023

Abstract: 

The multimodal imaging technique has gained the spotlight in the present era due to its striking and immense applications. It is the combination of two or more modalities that complement one another to yield detailed information. Indubitably, it is an emerging and crucial technique due to its broad clinical and research applications. The diagnostic techniques with the dual modality are aligned for obtaining molecular data. Positron emission tomography (PET) is a progressive imaging technique in nuclear medicine. To flourish in the imaging industry, PET was combined with computed tomography (CT), but the fusion of the two provides some challenges, such as less soft tissue contrast and inefficiency of acquisition in simultaneous mode. As a result, another hybrid imaging technology, PET and MRI (PET/MRI), has been developed to provide more soft tissue contrast and less radiation dose exposure, leading this technique to be used extensively despite its shortcomings. This review study discusses the fusion of PET/MRI, technical challenges for their combination, commercially available models, and clinical applications observed in the wide areas of oncology, the cardiovascular system, the central nervous system, pediatrics, and inflammatory diseases.

Keywords: 
hybrid imaging • PET/MRI • technical challenges • dose advantage
References: 
  1. Martí-Bonmatí L, Sopena R, Bartumeus P, Sopena P. Multimodality imaging techniques. Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2010 Jul-Aug;5(4):180-9. doi: 10.1002/cmmi.393. 
  2. Boss A, Bisdas S, Kolb A, Hofmann M, Ernemann U, Claussen CD, Pfannenberg C, Pichler BJ, Reimold M, Stegger L. Hybrid PET/MRI of intracranial masses: initial experiences and comparison to PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2010 Aug;51(8):1198-205. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.110.074773. 
  3. Catana C, Guimaraes AR, Rosen BR. PET and MR imaging: the odd couple or a match made in heaven? J Nucl Med. 2013 May;54(5):815-24. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.112771.
  4. Musafargani S, Ghosh KK, Mishra S, Mahalakshmi P, Padmanabhan P, Gulyás B. PET/MRI: a frontier in era of complementary hybrid imaging. Eur J Hybrid Imaging. 2018;2(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s41824-018-0030-6.
  5. Shao Y, Cherry SR, Farahani K, Meadors K, Siegel S, Silverman RW, Marsden PK. Simultaneous PET and MR imaging. Phys Med Biol. 1997 Oct;42(10):1965-70. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/10/010. 
  6. Pichler BJ, Kolb A, Nägele T, Schlemmer HP. PET/MRI: paving the way for the next generation of clinical multimodality imaging applications. J Nucl Med. 2010 Mar;51(3):333-6. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.109.061853.
  7. Berger A. How does it work? Positron emission tomography. BMJ. 2003 Jun 28;326(7404):1449. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7404.1449.
  8. Katal S, Eibschutz LS, Saboury B, Gholamrezanezhad A, Alavi A. Advantages and Applications of Total-Body PET Scanning. Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 7;12(2):426. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020426.
  9. Katti G, Ara S, Shireen A. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) – A Review. International Journal of Dental Clinics. 2011;3.
  10. Symms M, Jäger HR, Schmierer K, Yousry TA. A review of structural magnetic resonance neuroimaging. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Sep;75(9):1235-44. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2003.032714. 
  11. Olman CA, Harel N, Feinberg DA, He S, Zhang P, Ugurbil K, Yacoub E. Layer-specific fMRI reflects different neuronal computations at different depths in human V1. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32536. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032536. 
  12. Fink JR, Muzi M, Peck M, Krohn KA. Multimodality Brain Tumor Imaging: MR Imaging, PET, and PET/MR Imaging. J Nucl Med. 2015 Oct;56(10):1554-61. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.131516. 
  13. Paspulati RM, Partovi S, Herrmann KA, Krishnamurthi S, Delaney CP, Nguyen NC. Comparison of hybrid FDG PET/MRI compared with PET/CT in colorectal cancer staging and restaging: a pilot study. Abdom Imaging. 2015 Aug;40(6):1415-25. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0474-0. 
  14. Jadvar H, Connolly LP, Fahey FH, Shulkin BL. PET and PET/CT in pediatric oncology. Semin Nucl Med. 2007 Sep;37(5):316-31. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2007.04.001. 
  15. Catana C. Principles of Simultaneous PET/MR Imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2017 May;25(2):231-243. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2017.01.002. 
  16. Schlemmer HP, Pichler BJ, Schmand M, Burbar Z, Michel C, Ladebeck R, Jattke K, Townsend D, Nahmias C, Jacob PK, Heiss WD, Claussen CD. Simultaneous MR/PET imaging of the human brain: feasibility study. Radiology. 2008 Sep;248(3):1028-35. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2483071927. 
  17. Zaidi H, Ojha N, Morich M, Griesmer J, Hu Z, Maniawski P, Ratib O, Izquierdo-Garcia D, Fayad ZA, Shao L. Design and performance evaluation of a whole-body Ingenuity TF PET-MRI system. Phys Med Biol. 2011 May 21;56(10):3091-106. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/10/013. 
  18. Levin CS, Maramraju SH, Khalighi MM, Deller TW, Delso G, Jansen F. Design Features and Mutual Compatibility Studies of the Time-of-Flight PET Capable GE SIGNA PET/MR System. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2016 Aug;35(8):1907-14. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2016.2537811.
  19. Delso G, Fürst S, Jakoby B, Ladebeck R, Ganter C, Nekolla SG, Schwaiger M, Ziegler SI. Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner. J Nucl Med. 2011 Dec;52(12):1914-22. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.092726. Epub 2011 Nov 11. Erratum in: J Nucl Med. 2012 Mar;53(3):507. 
  20. Zaidi H, Del Guerra A. An outlook on future design of hybrid PET/MRI systems. Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5667-89. doi: 10.1118/1.3633909.
  21. Pichler BJ, Wehrl HF, Kolb A, Judenhofer MS. Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: the next generation of multimodality imaging? Semin Nucl Med. 2008 May;38(3):199-208. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2008.02.001. 
  22. Yamamoto S, Takamatsu S, Murayama H, Minato K. A block detector for a multislice, depth-of-interaction MR-compatible PET. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 2005;52(1):33-37. doi: 10.1109/TNS.2004.843091.
  23. Vandenberghe S, Marsden PK. PET-MRI: a review of challenges and solutions in the development of integrated multimodality imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2015 Feb 21;60(4):R115-54. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/4/R115. 
  24. Pichler BJ, Judenhofer MS, Catana C, Walton JH, Kneilling M, Nutt RE, Siegel SB, Claussen CD, Cherry SR. Performance test of an LSO-APD detector in a 7-T MRI scanner for simultaneous PET/MRI. J Nucl Med. 2006 Apr;47(4):639-47.
  25. Turkington TG. Attenuation correction in hybrid positron emission tomography. Semin Nucl Med. 2000 Oct;30(4):255-67. doi: 10.1053/snuc.2000.9542.
  26. Jacobs AH, Thomas A, Kracht LW, Li H, Dittmar C, Garlip G, Galldiks N, Klein JC, Sobesky J, Hilker R, Vollmar S, Herholz K, Wienhard K, Heiss WD. 18F-fluoro-L-thymidine and 11C-methylmethionine as markers of increased transport and proliferation in brain tumors. J Nucl Med. 2005 Dec;46(12):1948-58. 
  27. Yoon DY, Hwang HS, Chang SK, Rho YS, Ahn HY, Kim JH, Lee IJ. CT, MR, US,18F-FDG PET/CT, and their combined use for the assessment of cervical lymph node metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Eur Radiol. 2009 Mar;19(3):634-42. doi: 10.1007/s00330-008-1192-6. 
  28. Hirsch FW, Sattler B, Sorge I, Kurch L, Viehweger A, Ritter L, Werner P, Jochimsen T, Barthel H, Bierbach U, Till H, Sabri O, Kluge R. PET/MR in children. Initial clinical experience in paediatric oncology using an integrated PET/MR scanner. Pediatr Radiol. 2013 Jul;43(7):860-75. doi: 10.1007/s00247-012-2570-4. 
  29. Drzezga A, Souvatzoglou M, Eiber M, Beer AJ, Fürst S, Martinez-Möller A, Nekolla SG, Ziegler S, Ganter C, Rummeny EJ, Schwaiger M. First clinical experience with integrated whole-body PET/MR: comparison to PET/CT in patients with oncologic diagnoses. J Nucl Med. 2012 Jun;53(6):845-55. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.111.098608. 
  30. Quick HH, von Gall C, Zeilinger M, Wiesmüller M, Braun H, Ziegler S, Kuwert T, Uder M, Dörfler A, Kalender WA, Lell M. Integrated whole-body PET/MR hybrid imaging: clinical experience. Invest Radiol. 2013 May;48(5):280-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182845a08. 
  31. Mak D, Corry J, Lau E, Rischin D, Hicks RJ. Role of FDG-PET/CT in staging and follow-up of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011 Oct;55(5):487-99.
  32. Platzek I, Beuthien-Baumann B, Schneider M, Gudziol V, Langner J, Schramm G, Laniado M, Kotzerke J, van den Hoff J. PET/MRI in head and neck cancer: initial experience. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Jan;40(1):6-11. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2248-z.
  33. Varoquaux A, Rager O, Poncet A, Delattre BM, Ratib O, Becker CD, Dulguerov P, Dulguerov N, Zaidi H, Becker M. Detection and quantification of focal uptake in head and neck tumours: (18)F-FDG PET/MR versus PET/CT. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Mar;41(3):462-75. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2580-y. 
  34. Kubiessa K, Purz S, Gawlitza M, Kühn A, Fuchs J, Steinhoff KG, Boehm A, Sabri O, Kluge R, Kahn T, Stumpp P. Initial clinical results of simultaneous 18F-FDG PET/MRI in comparison to 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with head and neck cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014 Apr;41(4):639-48. doi: 10.1007/s00259-013-2633-2. 
  35. Wetter A, Lipponer C, Nensa F, Beiderwellen K, Olbricht T, Rübben H, Bockisch A, Schlosser T, Heusner TA, Lauenstein TC. Simultaneous 18F choline positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: initial results. Invest Radiol. 2013 May;48(5):256-62. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318282c654. 
  36. Quentin M, Schimmöller L, Arsov C, Rabenalt R, Antoch G, Albers P, Blondin D. Increased signal intensity of prostate lesions on high b-value diffusion-weighted images as a predictive sign of malignancy. Eur Radiol. 2014 Jan;24(1):209-13. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2999-3.
  37. Eiber M, Takei T, Souvatzoglou M, Mayerhoefer ME, Fürst S, Gaertner FC, Loeffelbein DJ, Rummeny EJ, Ziegler SI, Schwaiger M, Beer AJ. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions. J Nucl Med. 2014 Feb;55(2):191-7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.123646. 
  38. Jack CR Jr. Alzheimer disease: new concepts on its neurobiology and the clinical role imaging will play. Radiology. 2012 May;263(2):344-61. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12110433.
  39. Protas HD, Chen K, Langbaum JB, Fleisher AS, Alexander GE, Lee W, Bandy D, de Leon MJ, Mosconi L, Buckley S, Truran-Sacrey D, Schuff N, Weiner MW, Caselli RJ, Reiman EM. Posterior cingulate glucose metabolism, hippocampal glucose metabolism, and hippocampal volume in cognitively normal, late-middle-aged persons at 3 levels of genetic risk for Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2013 Mar 1;70(3):320-5. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamaneurol.286. 
  40. Shaffer JL, Petrella JR, Sheldon FC, Choudhury KR, Calhoun VD, Coleman RE, Doraiswamy PM; Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Predicting cognitive decline in subjects at risk for Alzheimer disease by using combined cerebrospinal fluid, MR imaging, and PET biomarkers. Radiology. 2013 Feb;266(2):583-91. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12120010.
  41. Song CI, Pogson JM, Andresen NS, Ward BK. MRI With Gadolinium as a Measure of Blood-Labyrinth Barrier Integrity in Patients With Inner Ear Symptoms: A Scoping Review. Front Neurol. 2021 May 20;12:662264. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.662264.
  42. Bisdas S, Koh TS, Roder C, Braun C, Schittenhelm J, Ernemann U, Klose U. Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted MR imaging of gliomas: feasibility of the method and initial results. Neuroradiology. 2013 Oct;55(10):1189-96. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1229-7.
  43. Fraioli F, Punwani S. Clinical and research applications of simultaneous positron emission tomography and MRI. Br J Radiol. 2014 Jan;87(1033):20130464. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130464.
  44. White JA, Rajchl M, Butler J, Thompson RT, Prato FS, Wisenberg G. Active cardiac sarcoidosis: first clinical experience of simultaneous positron emission tomography--magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of cardiac disease. Circulation. 2013 Jun 4;127(22):e639-41. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.001217.
  45. Schneider S, Batrice A, Rischpler C, Eiber M, Ibrahim T, Nekolla SG. Utility of multimodal cardiac imaging with PET/MRI in cardiac sarcoidosis: implications for diagnosis, monitoring and treatment. Eur Heart J. 2014 Feb;35(5):312. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht335.
  46. Ripa RS, Knudsen A, Hag AM, Lebech AM, Loft A, Keller SH, Hansen AE, von Benzon E, Højgaard L, Kjær A. Feasibility of simultaneous PET/MR of the carotid artery: first clinical experience and comparison to PET/CT. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Jul 10;3(4):361-71.

Download Article
Received June 7, 2023.
Accepted July 12, 2023.
©2023 International Medical Research and Development Corporation.